You can read it starting at page 23 of this link. By delving back into a topic that I first wrote about in an article for ABA/BNA that was itself a preview of a portion of a chapter of the book I was fortunate enough to co-author, the column is admittedly pretty self-referential. (And thus this post about the column even more so.) But, in my defense, it is all in service of publicly pointing out the relatively-humiliating point that no one seems to be listening to the solution we offered that we thought was a pretty good one. Instead, it appears the solution to this issue that I’ve offered is so unpersuasive that courts would rather turn to ignoring the straightforward meaning of words.
Categories
One reply on “Words Are Supposed to Mean Things: My latest print column in the Memphis Lawyer is out”
[…] a separate article written quite a few years ago. Instead, Missouri now adds itself onto the list (along with Nevada) of courts that would rather disregard the plain language of their own Rule 4.4, than admit […]